Why OSS

Veeam vs Firevault Physical Air Gap

Software immutability is not the same as physical disconnection. Compare Veeam and Firevault on the four dimensions that decide whether a backup survives when the production estate does not.

Corridor of offline storage racks inside a Firevault bunker
vs
Head To Head

Software Immutability or Physical Air Gap

The fundamental architectural difference between a hardened backup repository and a Layer 1 disconnected gold copy.

01
Software immutability on connected media

Veeam

Veeam is a backup and replication platform. Immutability is enforced in software using object lock on S3 compatible targets, hardened Linux repositories or tape out. The repository, the console and the credentials stay reachable on the estate network.

  • Software enforced immutability
  • Repository stays online
  • Depends on credential and console hygiene
02
Layer 1 physical air gap, no IP

Firevault Offline Secure Storage

Firevault holds the gold copy on dedicated hardware inside Firevault Bunkers, physically disconnected from any network. There is no NIC, no IP address and no console to compromise. Access is via scheduled identity verified connection windows only.

  • Physical air gap at Layer 1
  • No IP surface when disconnected
  • Identity verified scheduled retrieval
Four Dimensions

Where the Choice Actually Bites

Air gap type, blast radius on admin compromise, location and recovery behaviour. The places teams regret picking one tier when they needed both.

01
Logical immutability vs physical disconnection

Air Gap Type

Veeam immutability is enforced at the software layer on repositories that remain network reachable. Firevault is disconnected at Layer 1: the hardware has no route to the internet or the internal estate until a scheduled retrieval window opens.

  • Veeam: logical, always reachable
  • Firevault: physical, unreachable
  • No IP means no exploit path
02
Console and credentials vs physical custody

Blast Radius on Admin Compromise

If a Veeam service account, backup console or hypervisor is compromised, the attacker is inside the same trust boundary as the backups. Firevault sits outside that boundary. Compromising the production environment does not reach the offline copy.

  • Outside the domain trust boundary
  • No pass through from AD or SSO
  • Physical chain of custody
03
Customer datacentre or cloud vs UK Firevault Bunker

Where the Data Lives

Veeam repositories typically live inside your datacentre, a cloud bucket or a hosted immutability appliance. Firevault data is held in named UK colocation bunkers with documented physical security, monitored custody and no shared multi tenant network.

  • Named Firevault Bunker locations
  • Documented chain of custody
  • No multi tenant control plane
04
Instant restore vs scheduled physical retrieval

Recovery Behaviour

Veeam is optimised for fast operational restore of live workloads. Firevault is optimised as a gold copy of record: the copy you go to when the operational backup, the cloud tenancy or the domain itself is compromised. The two roles complement each other.

  • Operational restore stays with Veeam
  • Firevault holds the gold copy
  • Scheduled and audited retrieval

Want to see how Firevault compares against Glacier, tape and cloud too.

Compare five storage architectures
Questions

Veeam vs Firevault, Common Questions

Straight answers on how Offline Secure Storage® behaves in practice.

Mark Fermor
David Bailey
Kenny Phipps
Online Now
Concierge

Keep Veeam for restore, add Firevault for the gold copy

Talk to Firevault about adding a Layer 1 physical air gap alongside your existing Veeam estate.

Takes about 2 minutes. No account needed.

Free2 minsNo sign-up

    Your privacy matters

    We use cookies to keep the site running smoothly and to understand how you use it. You are in control. Privacy Charter · Cookie Policy