OT vs IT
Security
Same word, different discipline. Four differences that decide how you segment, patch, monitor and recover on an industrial estate.
Four Differences That Change Every Decision
Priority ranking, lifecycle, network engineering and recovery all pull OT security away from the IT security playbook.
Priority ranking is inverted
IT security ranks confidentiality first, then integrity, then availability. OT security inverts that: availability comes first because an unavailable plant is a safety event, then integrity of the process, then confidentiality. Every downstream decision, from patching to backup, follows from that inversion.
Lifecycles are decades, not quarters
IT kit refreshes on a three to five year cycle. OT kit runs for fifteen, twenty or thirty years, on operating systems that were current when it was installed. That means unpatched systems, legacy protocols and a much larger attack surface for anything that reaches the plant floor.
Networks are engineered, not managed
OT networks run deterministic industrial protocols and are engineered for predictable timing and safety. Introducing an IT security control that adds latency or drops packets can trigger a safety event. This is why standard IT tooling often cannot be deployed inside an OT estate without careful redesign.
Recovery is a first order requirement
IT security invests heavily in detection and response because the outcome of a compromise is often data loss. OT security must invest in recovery because the outcome is production loss and potential safety impact. A verified, offline gold copy that can be restored quickly is the anchor of any credible OT recovery plan.
Continue reading on the pillar guide and the definitional overview.
OT vs IT Security, Common Questions



Bring the offline gold copy into your OT plan
Talk to the Firevault team about a physically disconnected copy of your OT gold data, isolated from the domain that ransomware compromises first.
Takes about 2 minutes. No account needed.