Firevault, offline secure storage, physically disconnected from the internet
Pricing

Control and MITRE ATT&CK

Physical countermeasures for ATT&CK techniques.

Control removes the network reachability adversaries depend on. Where a technique needs a path, and the path is not there, the technique has nowhere to run.

As featured in

  • TechRadar Pro logo
  • Yahoo Finance logo
  • Channel Insider logo
  • Security Buyer logo
  • SecurityBrief logo

The problem

Detection alone struggles against sophisticated adversaries.

Attackers who live off the land look like your administrators. Removing the path does not depend on telling them apart.

  1. Control removes the network paths whole technique categories require, rather than detecting them after execution.

  2. Physical zone separation stops lateral movement between zones, whatever tools or credentials are used.

  3. Built-in tools and legitimate credentials do not open a physically severed zone boundary.

Problem 1

Technique volume.

Organisations cannot keep effective detection rules for every technique on every system.

Answered byPath removal

The mapping

Where ATT&CK tactics meet Control modules.

Enterprise and ICS tactics, grouped by what the adversary is trying to do, and the modules that remove the reachability each one needs.

ATT&CK tactic Control modules How Control helps
TA0001Initial Access
  • Fracture
  • Isolate
 Removes the standing inbound reach attackers assume.
TA0003Persistence
  • Lock
  • Unlink
 Privileged reach is a named session, not a standing right.
TA0004Privilege Escalation
  • Execute
  • Validate
 Boundary changes need explicit, quorum approval.
TA0007Discovery
  • Isolate
  • Lock
 The reachable surface is scoped to the named session.
TA0008Lateral Movement
  • Fracture
  • Isolate
  • Relay
 Inter-zone paths exist only when authorised, for the required window.
TA0009Collection
  • Lock
  • Isolate
 Sensitive stores need an approved Lock event to be reachable.
TA0010Exfiltration
  • Fracture
  • Unlink
 Outbound paths to unmanaged destinations are physically severed.
TA0040Impact
  • Anchor
  • Fracture
  • Validate
 Recovery copies sit in an offline vault.
TA0108Initial Access (ICS)
  • Fracture
  • Relay
 The IT-to-OT conduit is severed by default, and vendor reach is time-bound.
TA0107Inhibit Response Function (ICS)
  • Execute
  • Validate
  • Lock
 Safety-related changes are gated and confirmed.

Alignment, not certification. Control can help support these measures; your assessor decides what satisfies them.

The scenario

Scenario: a living-off-the-land attack meets path removal.

Detection rules tuned for months can be bypassed with built-in tools. A missing path does not need tuning. Step through it, or play it through.

Step 1 of 2

Without physical evidence

An advanced actor compromises a workstation and moves laterally using built-in Windows tools and valid credentials, with no malware.

Detection sees only normal administrative activity, and after three weeks the attacker reaches the OT network boundary.

Boundaries
Logical, configured in software
Evidence
Point-in-time, at each audit

An illustrative scenario.

Capabilities

What you get with every deployment.

Six things Control gives a MITRE ATT&CK programme, from the first boundary to the audit afterwards.

MITRE ATT&CK

Path removal

Control removes the network paths whole technique categories require, rather than detecting them after execution.

MITRE ATT&CK

Lateral movement limits

Physical zone separation stops lateral movement between zones, whatever tools or credentials are used.

MITRE ATT&CK

Credentials alone do not cross

Built-in tools and legitimate credentials do not open a physically severed zone boundary.

MITRE ATT&CK

Persistence limits

Time-limited access windows deactivate paths between authorised sessions.

MITRE ATT&CK

Technique mapping reports

Automated reports link module deployments to specific ATT&CK mitigations for risk assessment and audit.

MITRE ATT&CK

Impact resilience

Verified control-plane baselines held offline support recovery from ransomware, data destruction and recovery inhibition.

Adoption guide

From gap assessment to continuous evidence.

  1. 1

    Technique exposure assessment

    Map critical assets against network-dependent ATT&CK techniques to find the greatest risk reduction.

  2. 2

    Prevention architecture design

    Design physical zone boundaries that remove the highest-risk technique categories while keeping operations working.

  3. 3

    Red team validation

    Test Control in a non-production environment against techniques detection misses.

  4. 4

    Production deployment

    Full rollout with automated technique mapping, continuous evidence and verified baseline restoration.

Questions

What teams ask about Control and MITRE ATT&CK

No. Detection decides; Control enforces. It removes the paths that network-dependent techniques need, alongside your existing tools.

Those that depend on network reachability, including Initial Access, Persistence, Discovery, Lateral Movement, Collection, Exfiltration and Impact, plus ICS Initial Access and Inhibit Response Function.

Each module deployment is linked to the ATT&CK mitigations it supports, and reported automatically for risk assessment and audit.

A boundary at Layer 1 is not a rule to bypass in software, and its command path runs out of band. Physical access and the people who approve conduits still need governing, which is why every crossing is named and logged.

All questions

Map Control to your regulator’s language.

Walk through MITRE ATT&CK with the Firevault team and see where physical evidence fits your programme. Alignment, not certification.