Recent Breaches
Breaches
2026PowerSchool62.4M stolen62.4M records stolen2026DISA Global Solutions3.3M stolen3.3M records stolen2026Globe Life850K stolen850K records stolen2026Co-operative Group6.5 million members (names, contact details, dates of birth) stolen6.5 million members (names, contact details, dates of birth) records stolen2026HarrodsAttempted intrusion, limited disruption stolenAttempted intrusion, limited disruption records stolen2026Legal Aid Agency (Ministry of Justice)2.1 million applicants (financial, criminal, contact data since 2010) stolen2.1 million applicants (financial, criminal, contact data since 2010) records stolen2026Adidas UKCustomer contact details (subset) stolenCustomer contact details (subset) records stolen2026Peter Green ChilledOrder and logistics data stolenOrder and logistics data records stolen2026Jaguar Land RoverProduction and IT systems disrupted stolenProduction and IT systems disrupted records stolen2026Collins Aerospace (RTX)Check-in and boarding disruption across Heathrow, Brussels, Berlin stolenCheck-in and boarding disruption across Heathrow, Brussels, Berlin records stolen2026Co-operative Group6.5 million members (names, contact details, dates of birth) stolen6.5 million members (names, contact details, dates of birth) records stolen2026HarrodsAttempted intrusion, limited disruption stolenAttempted intrusion, limited disruption records stolen2026Legal Aid Agency (Ministry of Justice)2.1 million applicants (financial, criminal, contact data since 2010) stolen2.1 million applicants (financial, criminal, contact data since 2010) records stolen2026Adidas UKCustomer contact details (subset) stolenCustomer contact details (subset) records stolen2026Peter Green ChilledOrder and logistics data stolenOrder and logistics data records stolen2026Jaguar Land RoverProduction and IT systems disrupted stolenProduction and IT systems disrupted records stolen2026Collins Aerospace (RTX)Check-in and boarding disruption across Heathrow, Brussels, Berlin stolenCheck-in and boarding disruption across Heathrow, Brussels, Berlin records stolen2026PowerSchool62.4M stolen62.4M records stolen2026DISA Global Solutions3.3M stolen3.3M records stolen2026Globe Life850K stolen850K records stolen
View All →
OSS, Compliance & Risk

GDPR Compliance with Offline Secure Storage

GDPR Article 32 requires 'appropriate technical and organisational measures.' Offline Secure Storage (OSS) provides physical disconnection, the strongest technical measure available.

View All Compliance

We Think This Is Hard to Ignore

The ICO issued £14 million in fines to a single firm for failing to implement appropriate technical measures. At Firevault, personal data lives on hardware with no network connection, because Article 32 requires appropriate measures and physical disconnection is the strongest one available.

£14M

ICO fine to Capita for GDPR failures

ICO, October 2025

£1.2M

ICO fine to LastPass for data protection failures

ICO, December 2025

36,049

Data protection complaints received by ICO in 2024

ICO Annual Report 2024

6.5M

People affected by single Co-op data breach

BBC News, 2025

The Gap

Where current approaches fall short.

Most organisations rely on encryption and access controls alone. These are necessary but insufficient.

Encryption Is Not Enough

Encrypted data is still reachable, still targetable, and still at risk of key compromise.

Article 32 Demands More

'Appropriate measures' must be proportional to risk, for sensitive data, physical protection is expected.

ICO Expectations

The ICO increasingly expects demonstrable physical security measures for high-risk processing.

The Reality

GDPR enforcement is accelerating.

Capita: £14M Fine for Failing to Secure Personal Data

The ICO issued a combined £14 million fine to Capita for failing to implement appropriate technical measures under GDPR, after hackers accessed personal data of over 6 million people.

ICO, October 2025

LastPass: £1.2M Fine After 1.6 Million UK Users Exposed

The ICO fined LastPass £1.2 million for GDPR failures that allowed hackers to steal personal information of 1.6 million UK customers. The ICO described the security measures as unacceptable.

ICO, December 2025

Co-op: 6.5 Million Members' Data Stolen

Attackers exfiltrated personal data of all 6.5 million Co-op members. The ICO opened an investigation into whether appropriate technical measures were in place under Article 32.

BBC News, 2025

How OSS Maps

Physical disconnection as an appropriate measure.

Offline Secure Storage (OSS) directly satisfies GDPR Article 32 by providing physical technical measures.

  • Physical disconnection, the strongest technical measure available
  • Full audit trail for accountability requirements
  • Data minimisation through controlled access sessions
  • Integrity and confidentiality through tamper-evident storage

Take Personal Data Off Connected Systems

Step 1 of 3

Personal data is taken off always-connected systems and written to physically disconnected RAID 1 drives inside a Firevault Bunker. Data that is not online cannot be breached, scraped, or exfiltrated remotely.

Featured In

TechRadar Pro logoSecurity Buyer logoYahoo Finance logoSecurityBrief logoChannel Insider logo
Commercial Advantage

Win Business, Earn Trust, and Build Reputation with Butterfly

Butterfly is an operational model that helps organisations structure sensitive data to close deals faster, strengthen client relationships, and demonstrate the governance maturity that wins enterprise contracts.

Built on the VPPP framework (Vault, Policy, Permissions, Purpose), Butterfly maps your sensitive data and assigns dedicated Vaults by role, relationship, and purpose, turning data stewardship into a competitive advantage.

Deal Readiness

Governed materials ready to share with confidence

Client Trust

Demonstrate stewardship that earns loyalty

Board Confidence

Clear governance that inspires stakeholders

Enterprise Scale

Structure data governance across your organisation

Butterfly deployment model

Who Uses Butterfly?

  • Sales Teams

    Secure client proposals, pricing, and commercial intelligence

  • Service Providers

    Exchange sensitive documents with clients through governed Vaults

  • Businesses

    Protect strategic plans, IP, and competitive intelligence

  • Family Offices

    Structure data governance across principals, staff, and advisors

Questions

Frequently Asked

CAF-aligned

Mapped to CAF outcomes, not certified against CAF.

Firevault is not certified against the NCSC Cyber Assessment Framework. CAF is a self-assessment framework for essential service operators. The sections below show how our products help you evidence CAF outcomes in your own submission.

Offline Secure Storage and CAF

Using Offline Secure Storage supports CAF Objective B (Protecting against cyber attack) and Objective D (Minimising the impact of incidents). Gold copies live on hardware that is physically disconnected between sessions, giving operators evidence of protective isolation and a recoverable state.

Supports outcomes

B3 Data SecurityB5 Resilient Networks & SystemsD1 Response & Recovery Planning
How OSS maps

Taking Control, deploying Blueprints and CAF

Deploying a Control Blueprint supports CAF Objective A (Managing security risk) and Objective C (Detecting cyber security events). Blueprints document identity-verified access, session logging and segregation between operational and archived data, so the controls can be pointed at CAF outcomes in a self-assessment.

Supports outcomes

A2 Risk ManagementA4 Supply ChainC1 Security Monitoring
See Control Blueprints

Deploying Firebreak and CAF

Deploying Firebreak supports CAF Objective B (Protecting against cyber attack) at the network boundary of operational technology environments. Firebreak enforces physical-layer separation between OT and IT, giving CNI operators evidence of controlled paths for CAF network security outcomes.

Supports outcomes

B2 Identity & Access ControlB4 System SecurityB5 Resilient Networks & Systems
Explore Firebreak

Firevault maps controls to CAF outcomes to help essential service operators evidence their own self-assessment. Full mapping detail is available on request.

    Your privacy matters

    We use cookies to keep the site running smoothly and to understand how you use it. You are in control. Privacy Charter · Cookie Policy