Physical Compliance with NIS2 Directive Requirements
NIS2 requires essential and important entities to implement appropriate technical measures for network security, access control, and incident handling. Firevault Control provides physical enforcement that demonstrably exceeds directive requirements.
NIS2
NIS2 requires appropriate and proportionate measures. For essential services that underpin national infrastructure, appropriate means physical, not just logical.
Art. 21
Full Article 21 requirements coverage
100%
Physical network segmentation enforcement
24hr
Incident notification capability support
Full
Automated compliance evidence generation
NIS2 demands demonstrable security measures.
Proportionate Measures
NIS2 requires measures proportionate to the risk. For essential services, this means demonstrating that security measures go beyond standard software controls.
Network Segmentation
Article 21 requires network segmentation, but many organisations rely on VLAN-based separation that can be bypassed through misconfiguration.
Management Accountability
NIS2 introduces personal liability for management bodies. Demonstrating appropriate measures requires evidence that goes beyond compliance checklists.
The Scenario
Scenario: NIS2 Audit with Physical Evidence
An essential entity faces its first NIS2 compliance audit. The assessor examines network segmentation controls and finds that existing firewall-based segmentation, while configured correctly today, has experienced three misconfiguration incidents in the past year that temporarily created paths between zones. Each incident violated NIS2 requirements for the duration it existed. The organisation cannot demonstrate continuous compliance. With Firevault Control, the organisation presents physical zone boundary evidence showing continuous, unbroken zone separation. Conduit activations are logged with multi-party authorisation records. The assessor can verify that physical boundaries were maintained at all times, providing evidence of continuous compliance.
"Our auditor asked us to prove that our network segmentation had been continuously effective for the past twelve months. With firewall logs, we could show configuration at a point in time. We could not prove there had been no gaps between audits."
Exceed NIS2 requirements with physical measures.
Essential and important entities achieve NIS2 compliance through physical measures that demonstrably exceed directive requirements. Network segmentation is physical, not logical. Access control is multi-party and time-limited. Business continuity is guaranteed through air-gapped archives. Compliance evidence is generated continuously.
- Physical network segmentation exceeding Article 21 requirements
- Multi-party access control satisfying Article 21(2)(d)
- Continuous compliance evidence between assessments
- Management accountability documentation for Article 20
- Rapid incident containment for notification timelines
- Air-gapped recovery exceeding business continuity requirements
Fracture — Article 21(2)(c) Network Security
Module 1 of 4Provides physical network segmentation that directly satisfies NIS2 Article 21(2)(c) requirements for network security. Physical boundaries demonstrate a higher standard of protection than the directive requires.
Key Capabilities
EU Data Sovereignty
Data residency within UK and EU jurisdictions supports NIS2 requirements for appropriate data handling and sovereignty.
Management Accountability
Documented multi-party authorisation and governance processes demonstrate management oversight required by Article 20.
Continuous Evidence
Automated compliance logging generates continuous NIS2 evidence, eliminating gaps between point-in-time assessments.
Incident Response
Physical zone isolation capabilities support the rapid incident containment required by NIS2 notification timelines.
Audit-Ready Records
Tamper-proof logs provide complete audit trails for every network boundary state, access authorisation, and incident response action.
Recovery Assurance
Air-gapped recovery archives demonstrate business continuity capability that exceeds NIS2 disaster recovery requirements.
Demo to Live
Adoption Guide
NIS2 Gap Assessment
Map your current security measures against NIS2 Article 21 requirements to identify where physical enforcement strengthens your compliance position.
Compliance Architecture Design
Design physical zone boundaries and access controls that satisfy and exceed NIS2 requirements for your entity classification.
Evidence Validation
Deploy Control in a representative environment to validate compliance evidence generation and prepare for your first NIS2 assessment.
Full Compliance Deployment
Organisation-wide deployment with continuous compliance evidence, multi-party governance, and air-gapped recovery assurance.
NIS2 Gap Assessment
Map your current security measures against NIS2 Article 21 requirements to identify where physical enforcement strengthens your compliance position.
Compliance Architecture Design
Design physical zone boundaries and access controls that satisfy and exceed NIS2 requirements for your entity classification.
Evidence Validation
Deploy Control in a representative environment to validate compliance evidence generation and prepare for your first NIS2 assessment.
Full Compliance Deployment
Organisation-wide deployment with continuous compliance evidence, multi-party governance, and air-gapped recovery assurance.
Questions
Frequently Asked
Ready to take the next step?
See how Control can govern your data paths with physical enforcement no software exploit can bypass.